Search This Blog

Monday, October 25, 2010

UNICOM • ARC - The Best UNION PR Firm YOUR Money Can Buy?



We want you to know about the PR firm that Mehlville School District has employed solely to raise your taxes. And guess what? YOU ARE PAYING FOR IT!

UNICOM-ARC is owed by Labor Tribune publisher Ed Finkelstein and is a partisan firm that represents Democrats, PUBLIC SCHOOLS and political subdivisions staffed by public sector unions. 
In a description of itself that UNICOM-ARC posted on a directory of union shops (maintained by the Union Label & Service Trades Department of the AFL-CIO): "We are all-union communications and public relations firm that specializes in serving labor, non-profit and community-based organizations. Unicom-ARC is experienced in media outreach, planning campaign strategy and developing effective messages through focus groups and polling."
The bulk of their business comes from school districts who hire them for the explicit purpose of spiffing up their image as a prelude to passing tax hikes. (See below article, it will give you the scoop on what UNICOM-ARC is all about)
UNICOM-ARC was in charge (well over $100,000) of the Mehlville School District's COMPASS II public engagement meetings and is now in charge of the independent political campaign committee cramming Proposition C down our throats. Is there any conflict of interest here? 
The taxpayers pay for all of the polling and bogus community organizing (COMPASS II) that UNICOM-ARC provides, then the firm uses that same information to run an independent political campaign. UNICOM-ARC gets paid twice. Once by the taxpayers and once by the pro-Proposition C political committee. Can you say corrupt?
We are getting robbed by a public education system that is run BY THE UNIONS, FOR THE UNIONS! What about the kids?
Be an informed citizen and click here for a Google search about UNICOM-ARC. You will discover a distinct pattern of operation for UNICOM-ARC. They predictably get 80% of their business through no bid contracts with heavily unionized school districts in Missouri and Illinois. Non-union PR firms need NOT apply to the Mehlville School District.
Read the below article about UNICOM-ARC  from The Illinois Loop. Mehlville School District is wasting YOUR tax money to raise YOUR taxes. Its insane!
Spinmeisters Come To Town
by Kevin Killion
October 25, 2001
Schools Discover PR
      A new element is being added to the battle between the education monopoly and education reformers. The same tool used by marketers to sell soap, tobacco, and automobiles is now being used to convince your neighbors that everything is just fine and dandy at the local school -- except that much more money is needed. Schools have discovered the world of public relations!
      The residents in a community are usually first introduced to this new element when the district announces it has contracted with a "research company" hired (we are told) to conduct, tabulate and report a "community survey".
      Even a casual observer might find it curious that a school district would look all the way to St. Louis, say, to find a research company, when there is no shortage of solid, credible market research companies in Chicago. After all, Chicago is the home of the American Marketing Association, and thousands of market research professionals work in this area.
      As these "surveys" are done, parents might also find it a little odd that so little is asked in detail about what parents actually expect in curriculum, or what parents think about the curriculum or curriculum changes, how parents feel on such issues as phonics versus whole language, or how parents feel about the issue of endless "projects" versus substantive, coherent content.
The Agenda Behind "Community Surveys"
      The formula behind a typical so-called "survey" behind a PR campaign for higher taxes was spelled out with great candor at one of the sessions at the 2001 conference of the NSPRA, the National School Public Relations Association. Yes, there IS such an organization, and by all measures it's growing rapidly.
      At a session entitled "Getting Voter Approval the New Fail-Safe Way," a manager for one large school district and the PR head for a state school board association jointly shared their experiences in running hundreds of successful school levy and bond campaigns. This conference and this session was covered in reports by Mike Antonucci of the Education Intelligence Agency. Excerpted from his reports, here is what happened at that session:
          Campbell and Magmer suggested an early survey of all potential voters in order to learn where they stand on the levy. The yes votes are noted and divided by how frequently they vote. The no votes are questioned further, to determine if emphasizing a particular aspect of the levy's purpose moves their vote to yes. If so, these people are also noted. Those who can't be moved ("Men over 60 are death on wheels for most measures," Campbell said) are discarded and never referenced again. This is crucial to what follows. ... 
      To read more, and for the full details on the NSPRA conference, see the links at the bottom of this page.
UNICOM-ARC: When Your District Needs Hired Guns
      Here in the Chicago area and elsewhere in Illinois, one name that pops up frequently is that of "UNICOM-ARC". This St. Louis firm has been hired by school districts in the Chicago area, including Barrington D220, Carpentersville, Deerfield D109, Glenbard High School District 87, Glen Ellyn D41, Glenview D34, Gurnee (Woodland) D50, Gurnee D56, Highland Park, Kenilworth D38, Lake Zurich D95, Libertyville/Vernon Hills High School D128, Lockport Township D205, Mt. Prospect D57, Naperville D203, North Palos D117, Park Ridge-Niles D64, Roselle D108, St. Charles, Skokie D69, Skokie (East Prairie) D73, Wheaton-Warrenville D200, and Woodstock D200, as well as in a number of school districts downstate including Belvidere D100, Collinsville D10, Springfield D186, and O'Fallon Township in St. Clair County.
      It's most revealing to do a little checking around on this "UNICOM-ARC" company.
      Turns out that UNICOM-ARC is no run of the mill "research" company. In a description of itself that UNICOM-ARC posted on a directory of union shops (maintained by the Union Label & Service Trades Department of the AFL-CIO), they say,
          We are all-union communications and public relations firm that specializes in serving labor, non-profit and community-based organizations. Unicom-ARC is experienced in media outreach, planning campaign strategy and developing effective messages through focus groups and polling ... 
      The bulk of their business comes from school districts who hire them for the explicit purpose of spiffing up their image as a prelude to passing tax hikes.
      We can quickly realize that when a "community survey" is conducted, parents and teachers should NOT expect UNICOM-ARC to deliver an unbiased report on what the town really wants  -- that's NOT what they were hired to do, and it's not what they do for a living.
      Take a look for yourself: here is the UNICOM-ARC website.
      Here is their own statement of what they do:
          Since 1970, our INTEGRATED approach has helped the UNICOM•ARC team build an 80% "win" record in 118 election campaigns and develop a well-earned reputation for taking on difficult and complex issues and turning them into success stories. 
      This bit is revealing:
          Using research as a guide we implement the most effective strategies to reach out to the target audience and build better understanding or awareness of an issue or product. This is best achieved by letting your audience "discover" firsthand the challenges you face or the advantages of your product or service, then engaging them in meaningful two-way dialog at a grassroots level. 
      (Note: the extremely revealing quotes above around the word "discover" are theirs, not mine.)
      UNICOM-ARC's pride over the "accomplishments" of its head of their educational division is described this way:
          Dan Burns, Executive Director of Education Communications, UNICOM•ARC
          As the long-time Director of Communications and Planning for the Rockwood (MO) School District, Dan was widely regarded as one of the top school communicators in the nation. During his tenure there, the District passed 13 bond proposals totaling $240 million (including the largest school bond proposal ever passed in the St. Louis County area) and three successful operating levy increases. 
      Here, UNICOM-ARC is very proud of what they did in west suburban district 300:
          In November 2000, UNICOM•ARC helped the District pass an $88 million bond issue (which required a 33-cent tax increase)... The campaign was preceded by a lengthy public engagement process, facilitied by UNICOM•ARC, in which more than 3,000 District residents participated in the creation of a the plan which was eventually approved by voters. 
      On the same page they also report winning awards at the recent conference of the NSPRA, the National School Public Relations Association. UNICOM-ARC presented one of the sessions at this spin-fest, and here is the official description of that session from the conference program book:
          Promoting a facilities or operations plan created "top down" by district officials is becoming increasingly difficult. This session will outline a groundbreaking process to engage the public to "discover" the challenges you face, and then create and support a plan to meet your needs. 
      Again, the quotes around the word "discover" are theirs, not mine.
      (For much more detail on the events of the NSPRA conference, follow the links near the bottom of this page to the reports from the Education Intelligence Agency.)
      Of particular interest, take a look at UNICOM-ARC's web page on "case studies":
          Community Unit District 300 in western suburban Chicago had lost three times in a row at the polls with plans to deal with explosive student growth and severely aging facilities. ... District 300 had to deal with a vigilant anti-tax group who opposed all ballot initiatives, along with a series of unpopular administrative decisions that led to a complete lack of trust of the District by the public. ... Utilizing UNICOM•ARC's award-winning model for public engagement, the newfound FACE Committee held planning meetings in every school building, brought in architects and financial planners, and created a new plan ... With the momentum from that process behind them, the FACE leaders then led the election campaign for an $88 million bond issue that residents approved in November 2000. 
Paying for Your Brainwashing
      Who is paying for all this spinmeistering on behalf of local districts? In many cases, it's the taxpayers, through their local school boards who claim that hiring of companies like UNICOM-ARC is for the purpose of "research" (which is legal) rather than political action (which is not). In other cases, it's a "community" group that fronts for a tax hike, soliciting "donations" from residents or local businesses.
      It's interesting that as school districts and boards are squawking louder and louder about money (even in exceptionally well-larded districts), they see no problem with spending dough on public relations gimmickry rather than on engaging the community in honest discussions of the kinds of schools they want -- the kind of discussion that could lead to genuine community support.
      More and more, the voters are wising up. In response, tax hike proponents are being more cautious in their PR efforts. From the Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2002:
          "You have to be real careful about looking too slick and too clean," [the co-chairman of a Naperville campaign] said. "You want it to be citizens selling the referendum to citizens. You don't want it to be Madison Avenue selling it. People get suspicious." 
      Even UNICOM-ARC is aware that there are limits to polished campaigns on behalf of skyrocketing tax hikes. From the Chicago Tribune, March 9, 2002:
          "In more and more communities, there seems to be more opposition that is cropping up ... they are much more organized than they were 20 years ago. They are networked," said Rodney Wright, president of UNICOM/ARC... 
      Dear readers, welcome to the network! 
How To Learn More About Schools and Public Relations
      Here are some articles and links that will help you to learn more about how your tax dollars are being used to sell higher taxes and oddball innovations in your local schools:
    * To learn about expenditures for specific PR companies (e.g., Unicom-ARC) or on behalf of pro-tax-hike organizations (e.g., "Save Our Schools", "Community Partnership for Education ") associated with school districts, go to the "Campaign Disclosure" section of the website of the Illinois State Board of Education. Expenditures can be searched in a variety of ways, though you may need to do some exploring to discover them all.
    * National School Public Relations Association (NSPRA):
      Here is a wonderful series of reports from the NSPRA Conference, Minneapolis, July 9-11, 2001 prepared by Mike Antonucci of the Education Intelligence Agency. These are gems -- well-researched and in-depth, and fun to boot!
          o Report for July 9, 2001: Excerpt...
            "No doubt you have a few questions about NSPRA and about why I am here. First, I will venture a guess that many of you are unaware your school districts employ public relations officers, or that there are enough of them to have a national organization and a conference. I assure you there are over 1,000 school district public relations officers at this event, along with some superintendents and other school officials."
          o Report for July 10, 2001: The EIA covers some of the main sessions of the conference, including such eye-openers as how to appeal to the "75 percent of the public have no children in the public schools", a very revealing session on getting out the yes vote in referendum campaigns entitled "Getting Voter Approval the New Fail-Safe Way," and a watch-your-behind session named "Communicating Proactively in Sensitive Situations."
          o Report for July 11, 2001: the EIA covers more NSPRA sessions, including one called (no kidding) "'Bribing' Your Critics and Other Unusual Community Involvement Strategies." There is a mention of why it is important to involve real estate professionals in your education work. Best of all, the EIA report includes the delicious names of a number of sessions that could not be covered due to time constraints, including "Dealing with Public Anger" and "How to Outwit, Outplay and Outlast Our Critics".
    * PR and the Public Schools; Before announcing bad test scores, inspire community pride by George A. Clowes, School Reform News, October 2001
    * How Schools "Manage" Parents, School Reform News, October 2001. This is a review of the book Parents and Schools: The 150-Year Struggle for Control in American Education by Temple University history professor William Cutler. The review starts by asking this compelling question: "Why is it that parents who give a mediocre grade to public schools in general almost invariably have a favorable impression of the performance of their local public school?"
    * Here is an additional review of Parents and Schools: The 150-Year Struggle for Control in American Education by William Cutler. This review also starts with questions: "Why aren't schools more responsive to parent and taxpayer demands for improvement? Is it because they are a monopoly and they just don't care? Is it because they are increasingly influenced by unions and put member interests ahead of the public interest? Or, is it, as the schools claim, because they can't do better given their resources? William Cutler's new book implicitly raises another possibility: Is it because they aren't making a good faith effort to change? If history is a guide, the answer is yes. Cutler shows that schools and parents have been at odds for a very long time. Instead of acting to fulfill the expectations of parents and the public, the schools have historically sought to shape and reshape the views of parents and the public to suit their own ideas about education's aims and purposes." Note: This review is also available as a PDF document.
Schools, Teachers, Parents and the Community
      For more about public relations techniques used by school districts, go to this page:     Illinois Loop: Schools and Public Relations
      For more information on the role, perspectives and involvement of teachers, parents and the community with schools, see these additional pages on our website:
          o Public Relations: Your school may have hired professional help in selling a change to your community
          o PTAs, PTOs and Other Groups: Who does your PTA really represent?
          o School Committees: Have you served on a school committee? Were you disappointed with the results? Read this!
          o In-Service Workshops: What are the teachers doing when the kids have that day off?
          o Parent Rights: What are your recourses when normal channels have let you down? 
Copyright 2006, The Illinois Loop. All Rights Reserved.

14 comments:

  1. Schools need PR firms so that they can effectively educate the community on their needs, current status, and future vision. If they didn't have groups of citizens who fight public education with misinformation campaigns, PR firms would not be necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Don't the taxpayers ALREADY pay over $100,000 a year for Mehlville's in-house PR dept.? Why must we pay TWICE? Maybe if the district was run in the interest of the taxpayers and kids, they wouldn't need UNICOM.

    If Prop C goes down can we get a rebate from the union PR firm UNICOM-ARC?

    BTW, it is our constitutional RIGHT to stand up against higher taxes that will only feather the nests of public sector unions. You must be a fascist or WORSE!!!!!

    Mehlville is a district with crappy academics. Yet it seems very proficient in raising salary and benefits for its union employees. UNICOM-ARC doesn't deserve ONE CENT from the over-burdened citizens of south county. VOTE NO ON C!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Restore the Pride Committee is paying for Unicom-ARC, not the Mehlville School District.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It would be ok if you fought taxes based on factual information, but you don't. You are sorely misinformed. It's one thing to say you don't want to pay more taxes, it's another thing completely to make up reasons for your opposition. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous 1, we know Restore the Pride is paying the union PR firm. But the district has already shelled out hundreds of thousands of dollars to UNICOM-ARC for COMPASS and to "mentor" is own PR dept.

    Anonymous 2, We are not misinformed, we know exactly how much Mehlville Schools are ripping us off. We know the facts. You are trying to distort the truth. You guys are toast.The taxpayers know the scoop.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Babelizer, us "guys" are not toast if this fails. We are all toast. Your completely lack of disregard for the children in this community is appalling. However, since you believe you are factually correct, you are likely not capable of understanding neither what Prop C stands for, nor what the consequences of failure are. You are so stuck in your "adult" world of political nonsense that you insist on cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unwashed Stupid VoterOctober 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM

    Anonymous, your comment "However, since you believe you are factually correct, you are likely not capable of understanding neither what Prop C stands for" tells us a lot about you.

    Yes we are so stupid and you are so smart.

    I guess we are too busy clinging to God and our guns to fully comprehend your enlightened liberal opinion. Since you are so much more intelligent than us, maybe you can read the writing on the wall.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous, why don't you persuade the undecided voters to vote for this sham instead of us.

    Mehlville has underachieved for years and property values were stable until the crash. That argument is a red herring.

    Prop C is NOT FOR THE KIDS!! It's a huge giveaway to the bureaucrats and union employees who retire at 58 and are paid handsomely for the remainder of their natural lives.

    Political nonsense? You liberals have written the book! Mehlville teachers and principals are brainwashing kids and sending campaign literature home with them!

    The slumbering taxpayer has awakened with a vengeance and will not allow anymore waste of their hard-earned money on more HUGE salary and benefits raises for unionized public education elites.

    Over 50% of Mehlville residents now send their kids to private schools. These folks have already voted with their feet.

    Your time would be better spent contacting those who support you rather than bothering those of us who do not.

    Your scare tactics and "for the kids" propaganda doesn't work on us anymore. You need a better PR firm.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Karl Marx was a great fan of "free public schools" and the progressive tax system. Unionized public education works as well as socialism does in other sectors of American society, not well. Socialist institutions inevitably spawn vast bureaucratic structures of underachievement managed by an elite "vanguard".

    In Mehlville's case, the administrators, teachers, labor unions and politicians act as the "vanguard" ruling class and demand tribute (taxes) from the check-writing nincompoops known as the "taxpayers".

    The Mehlville ruling class thinks we are all a bunch of dumbsh..s who are not intelligent enough to comprehend the esoteric and byzantine labyrinth of the public school system. Well, we went to Mehlville high school what do they expect? :)

    Tom Diehl, Karl Frank, Jr., Terry Noble, Rod Wright, the Mehlville NEA. They are the experts. They are the infallible vanguard of public education. We (us taxpayers) are much too stupid to have an opinion about how we run our local governments.

    Our ruling class just wants us to shut up, write the check and don't ask questions. The vanguard knows how to spend YOUR money much better than you could. They are SMART! They will redistribute your money to all of their pet special interests which benefits THEM (since they are so special and are so underpaid). Oh yeah, they will also be back on the ballot NEXT YEAR for more!

    This election is no longer about children and that is a shame. It's about the arrogance and incompetence of Tom Diehl and his budget-busting Board of Education. It's also about Terry Noble's unconscionable $44,000 raise that 82% of Mehlville citizens oppose.

    Unfortunately, our public education system is no longer sustainable in its current form. The vanguard experts have destroyed our schools and no amount of money can fix it. They are responsible for this failure, not us. We are too stupid.

    I have a news flash for the vanguard ruling class: We are at the gates with our torches and pitchforks. We have had enough. Viva revolution!

    Vote no on C.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous said... Babelizer, us "guys", just what does Prop C stand for? If it is for the children, why does the ballot language read, and I quote, "up to $.40 is to be used for capital improvements". The remainder ($.48) is to be used for operational cost. Hmm? If it sor the kids why is not up to $.60 for books, smart boards, prep material and so on. Nope the majority of the money is to go to operations, which is smoke and mirrors for salary increases. Enough is Enough.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't even know why you let these Nazi, fascist, liberal, communist, socialist, pinko pigs comment here. It is clear that those board members are only in it for the money. I'm sorry, but I work hard for my money and I ain't given it up to some limosine lefty. My parents worked hard for me to go to school to Northwest and now everybody wants everything free. What ever happened to hard work?

    The founding fathers would have never supported public education. Why do you think that most of them only had a second grade level education?

    ReplyDelete
  12. The bottom line is that those who want more money spent on their kids' public education can simply write a big fat check to the Mehlville School District equal to what they think their child is entitled to. Why do you continue to want ME to pay for YOUR kid? I don't even have kids in the Mehlville School District.

    As far as the "consequences of failure" that one 'anonymous' person wrote above, what dire consequences await seniors who cannot afford to pay more taxes for your kid? A senior death panel ??

    You have nerve to threaten us with "dire consequences." Go write a big fat check to Mehlville and shut up already, you phony leftist.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You dudes certainly have one thing right, Unicom-ARC is by far the best PR firm money can buy.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No matter what ANYONE says, it's NOT for the children!

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for contacting the MCTA. Your comment will be considered for posting.